Linux Questions and And Answers

 

So what is Linux?

    Sir: Linux is an operating system kernel project which was started in 1991 by Linus Torvalds, a Finnish computer engineering student.

    I'm grieving. What do I mean by mi What is Linux ir?

    Hmm. Linux is really an operating system kernel project. But I understand what you really want to hear. Let me talk about a few small concepts that we may need on the way to the answer you're looking for before, but then comes the following: 'Operating system' is probably the most basic, indispensable collection of software that allows us to run the applications we want on our computer and use our hardware. The core is the core component of this software community. Linux is actually the core of many open source operating systems, but over the years, the Linux name has been defined as the whole of open source operating systems.

    Haha. The most famous ”open source software“ event. I'm going to ask you a question about a lot of bombs.

    Although it deserves a very detailed explanation, I simply try to summarize it. The relationship between the software and their source code is similar to the relationship between the dishes and the recipes of those dishes. The source code is a human notation that can be understood by a human in a specific, formal structure. The source code of a software tells you exactly what that software does. Source code is subject to certain operations and the famous 1 and 0, consisting of binary software that can be understood and operated by the computer. In the meantime, this conversion is unidirectional, that is, it cannot be converted into a software source code, but the source code can be converted into software.

    I gave up the bomb question. Then I'il ask him. Another question: Linux is developing a lot of people. Is it correct?

    True.

    But this project was launched by Linus Torvalds ... Well, what if one day the gentleman called Linus closes Linux's source code? You know, if all these people help, you know what they do?

    You asked the cliché question of the people who were in the vision of things, but you provided me with a good starting point. Yeah, Linus Torvalds can do something like that. To date, anyone who has contributed to Linux's source code can sign off Linux's source code, agreeing to give away money and renounce copyrights. But the source code of the previous kernel version can not prevent the development of the kernel with a different name. What makes this and the contributors feel safe is the GPL, the General Public License.

    I have the feeling that I'm heading for the original answer to my first question. Let me ask you to show me the courtesy that you didn't show me and let me ask you medi what is this GPL license?

    You are very kind thank you. GPL is a free software license. When a software is licensed with this license, the source code is gifted to the community and gives everyone the right without any discrimination: yazılım You can run this software for the purpose you want ı,: You can change the source code of this software as you wish olur, lisans Share the original or the version of this software with the community, You can copy as much as you want ist. This approach is more than the understanding of the world of information we are accustomed to, human approach.

    The fact that the act is heard does not come alive in my mind.

    In fact, there are a number of practical and indirect benefits. Once developed under the GPL umbrella, the software is developed for the benefit of bırak society sarf and yazılım humanity ıc without distinction from the beginning to the end, without requiring any special effort. Why is that? Because, software developers do not spend time on rediscovering the wheel, they can produce new software by using those solutions directly without solving the previously solved problems. So it's time to put new ideas into practice instead of wasting time with details (for example, Firefox is a known example). Thanks to the new ideas, there are more diverse and good alternatives to computer users. On the other hand, users can allocate software wages to hardware or other needs and increase the standards of living and working, since they can be abilir owner ve with free software at most cost 0. High working standard improves efficiency and so on.

You explained well. But you're not a stranger, let me be clear. Cost event is not a very valid argument in my opinion, maliyet DVD full program $ 3, what are you talking about cost? De they say.

    Well thank you. If I'm not a stranger, then I'm not gonna talk. Many people think in the way you say and use their computers with unpaid, copy software. Those who do this, both conscientiously and legally, are criminals unfortunately. If a producer wants a price for his software, I think it is a great injustice to the manufacturer not to pay for his labor and to use the software illegally. I don't know how people are doing their conscience, but I'm relying on the lack of time to build the ethics of informatics because of the rapidly growing IT industry. Aside from the question of conscience, it is an act that makes people fall into a state of law against the law. It is a pity that people are considered to have committed crimes that they wouldn't even think of doing throughout their lives because they wanted to meet their needs. But the more distressing is that they are used to it and ignore alternatives. On the other hand, as a person who can continue to live with a DVD full program, what about state institutions? If we think in a totally emotional way in our country, the state buys millions of dollars of software every year, although there are open source alternatives. It is certainly not the country that has practical problems to be solved with this money?

    You're embarrassed me by calling me a conscience.

    And you have something like that, for example, you pay and use the license price of a closed source software. So both laws and conscience are happy. Let's say a friend of you asked for a copy of this software, but the license of the software does not allow it. What do you do?

    Trap question. I can't save what I say. You can do whatever you want.

    Please answer the questions. Is that what I'm doing to you?

    Good. I will.

    You give. So, when you do this, don't we go back to the original situation because you violated the license agreement? Are you doing something wrong both conscientiously and legally and don't you make your friend do the same wrong?

    Good. I do not give.

    My daughter. Anyways. Don't give this place a place, in fact: travel to the other end of the coin. I think that the creation of such a dilemma is one of the biggest stakes in humanity. Also, I think this situation brings out one of the concepts that are the basis of open source software and provide to people: sharing.

    I thought you were gonna say freedom.

    I had calculated that I would say, but there would be no pat freedom pat. But when you think about the GPL provisions, you may feel a general sense of freedom.

    Okay, I got it. So let's say something has come alive in my head. It's a beautiful event, there's somebody, they write code and they open it, others can use what they write, they can use what others have written, they have a license, they make these things public. It's also nice to use free software.

    And the most effective way to use free software is to use a Linux distribution.

Hah, Linux distribution, what is this?

    Linux distribution refers to an operating system that works in harmony with the Linux kernel and its surrounding free software, enabling ease of installation and removal of new applications.

    From there, you can gather the open source code from there and make it into compatible systems, and this becomes a Linux distribution?

    Yes, some are writing their own tools, some are easier than others. But each of them promises users the pleasure and peace of mind of using computers freely.

    Of course, it promises to give you peace of mind, but I see people talking about the difficulty of Linux. Who knows what I'm gonna do if I just sit on my head. I have a discouragement about this.

    Now the distribution has improved a lot. I admit, it wasn't that easy. But Pardus is installed with seven clicks, for example, other Linux distributions are no longer in it. A lot of people can easily use Pardus or other distributions after a short period of familiarization. Somewhere, we need to dare and give Linux a chance. Finally, the power that gives power to users. You're going to make a serious contribution, even by just using it.

    Well. I'm gonna try that after all. As a result, I understand the meaning of Linux is a little enlarged. In Linux, people are talking about an operating system and an understanding that is now surrounded by free software.

    Yes that's right. I am briefly the key to freedom.

    You were doing really good. The last thing you say is that it smells a lot of advertising, and it's not unique at all. Come on, I'm not a stranger, but don't tell anyone else.